Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith
8 N.E.3d 968, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 Ohio St. 3d 325 →
Opinion
This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline that recommends the court impose discipline against respondent. On May 1, 2014, respondent filed a motion for leave to file a reply brief. On May 5, 2014, relator filed a motion to strike respondent’s motion for leave to file a reply brief.
Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that respondent’s motion for leave to file a reply brief is denied and relator’s motion to strike is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith, 8 N.E.3d 968, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1500 (Ohio 2014).
8 N.E.3d 968 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.