Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick

2019 Ohio 820, 126 N.E.3d 1187, 156 Ohio St. 3d 1259

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 11, 2019

Docket2017-1735

StatusPublished

This text of 2019 Ohio 820 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick, 2019 Ohio 820, 126 N.E.3d 1187, 156 Ohio St. 3d 1259 (Ohio 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Howard Evan Skolnick, Attorney Registration No. 0061905, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 1, 2018, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, with the final six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick , 153 Ohio St.3d 283 , 2018-Ohio-2990 , 104 N.E.3d 775 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI