Disciplinary Counsel v. Simakis

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Simakis

703 N.E.2d 1281, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1457, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 50

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 5, 1999

Docket98-1815

StatusPublished

This text of 703 N.E.2d 1281 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Simakis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Simakis, 703 N.E.2d 1281, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1457, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 50 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

On September 2,1998, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed an amended motion for an order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order requiring respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court’s order of suspension dated July 2, 1998. On October 29, 1998, the court granted the motion to the extent that respondent was ordered to show cause by filing a written response why he should not be found in contempt. Respondent did not respond to the order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent George Konstantine Simakis appear in person before this court on Tuesday, February 9,1999, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On September 2,1998, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed an amended motion for an order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order requiring respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court’s order of suspension dated July 2, 1998. On October 29, 1998, the court granted the motion to the extent that respondent was ordered to show cause by filing a written response why he should not be found in contempt. Respondent did not respond to the order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent George Konstantine Simakis appear in person before this court on Tuesday, February 9,1999, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

703 N.E.2d 1281, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1457, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-simakis-ohio-1999.