Disciplinary Counsel v. Sarver

2017 Ohio 7742, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1439
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 22, 2017
Docket2017-1081
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 Ohio 7742 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Sarver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Counsel v. Sarver, 2017 Ohio 7742, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2017).

Opinion

On August 7, 2017, the Board of Professional Conduct filed a final report in the office of the clerk of this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(16), in which the board accepted the agreement entered into by relator, disciplinary counsel, and respondent, Jason Allan Sarver. The agreement set forth the misconduct and the agreed, recommended sanction of a two-year suspension from the practice of law, with the entire suspension stayed on the condition that respondent engage in no further misconduct. The board recommended that the agreement be accepted. The court, sua sponte, issued an order waiving the issuance of a show-cause order, and this matter was submitted to the court on the report and record filed by the board.

Sua sponte, the recommended sanction is rejected. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D), this cause is remanded to the Board of Professional Conduct for further proceedings, including consideration of a more severe sanction. Proceedings before this court in this ease are stayed until further order of this court. Costs to abide final determination of the case.

O’Neill, J., dissents and would adopt the agreement and suspend respondent for two years with the entire suspension stayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 7742, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-sarver-ohio-2017.