Disciplinary Counsel v. Rammelsberg
This text of 998 N.E.2d 1188 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Rammelsberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio filed a certification of default in the office of the clerk of this court. On March 22, 2013, this court imposed an interim default-judgment suspension upon respondent, Sharri Una Rammelsberg, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6a)(B)(1). Respondent was ordered to show cause why the interim default-judgment suspension should not be converted into an indefinite suspension. Respondent filed objections, relator filed an answer, and this cause was considered by the court.
On consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that this matter is remanded to the board for further proceedings under Gov.Bar R. V(6), including a formal hearing on relator’s complaint.
The court further orders that the interim default-judgment suspension imposed against respondent on March 22, 2013, shall remain in place while this matter is pending before the board. Proceedings before this court in this case are stayed until further order of this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
998 N.E.2d 1188, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-rammelsberg-ohio-2013.