Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi

117 Ohio St. 3d 1226
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 Ohio St. 3d 336
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 2008·No. No. 2006-2334·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Joseph F. Rafidi, Attorney Registration No. 0073061, last known business address in Youngstown, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 25, 2007, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4}'It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi, 114 Ohio St.3d 336, 2007-Ohio-3674, 872 N.E.2d 265.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1226 (Ohio 2008).

117 Ohio St. 3d 1226 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi
114 Ohio St. 3d 336 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)