Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman

893 N.E.2d 846, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1455

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 2008·No. 2005-1531·Published

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on July 14, 2008, by relator, Disciplinary Counsel, of a motion to lift stayed suspension and impose a one-year actual suspension from the practice of law. Respondent filed a memo in opposition to the motion. Upon consideration thereof,

[1456] It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent and would grant the motion. Cupp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on July 14, 2008, by relator, Disciplinary Counsel, of a motion to lift stayed suspension and impose a one-year actual suspension from the practice of law. Respondent filed a memo in opposition to the motion. Upon consideration thereof,

[1456] It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent and would grant the motion. Cupp, J., not participating.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman, 893 N.E.2d 846, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

893 N.E.2d 846 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.