Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman

893 N.E.2d 846, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1455

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 2008

Docket2005-1531

StatusPublished

This text of 893 N.E.2d 846 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman, 893 N.E.2d 846, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on July 14, 2008, by relator, Disciplinary Counsel, of a motion to lift stayed suspension and impose a one-year actual suspension from the practice of law. Respondent filed a memo in opposition to the motion. Upon consideration thereof,

[1456]*1456It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent and would grant the motion. Cupp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on July 14, 2008, by relator, Disciplinary Counsel, of a motion to lift stayed suspension and impose a one-year actual suspension from the practice of law. Respondent filed a memo in opposition to the motion. Upon consideration thereof,

[1456]*1456It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent and would grant the motion. Cupp, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

893 N.E.2d 846, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-quatman-ohio-2008.