Disciplinary Counsel v. Pullins

932 N.E.2d 884, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1554
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Pullins. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 Ohio St. 3d 436
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 27, 2010·No. 2010-0851·Published

Opinion

The matter is pending before the court upon the filing by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of its final report on May 12, 2010. On August 16, 2010, respondent filed a motion to supplement the record. Relator filed a memo in opposition to the motion. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that respondent’s motion to supplement the record is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pullins, 932 N.E.2d 884, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1554 (Ohio 2010).

932 N.E.2d 884 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Pullins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.