Disciplinary Counsel v. Perrico
Opinion
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PERRICO.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Perrico, 2026-Ohio-194.]
(No. 2023-1274—Submitted January 22, 2026—Decided January 23, 2026.)
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Daniel Edward Perrico, Attorney Registration No. 0071617, last known business address in Westlake, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 25, 2024, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with one year stayed on condition, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
{¶ 5} For previous case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Perrico, 2024-Ohio-
1540.
KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, BRUNNER, DETERS, HAWKINS, and SHANAHAN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2026 Ohio 194 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Perrico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.