Disciplinary Counsel v. Pagac

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pagac

767 N.E.2d 732, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1445

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 9, 2002

Docket1994-2701

StatusPublished

This text of 767 N.E.2d 732 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Pagac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pagac, 767 N.E.2d 732, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1445 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

On June 28,1995, this court permanently disbarred respondent, Paul Pagac III, Attorney Registration No. 0015049, last known business address in Youngstown, Ohio. On March 28, 2002, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for order to show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court’s June 28,1995 order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be and is hereby granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before 20 days from the date of this order why respondent should not be held in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On June 28,1995, this court permanently disbarred respondent, Paul Pagac III, Attorney Registration No. 0015049, last known business address in Youngstown, Ohio. On March 28, 2002, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for order to show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court’s June 28,1995 order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be and is hereby granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before 20 days from the date of this order why respondent should not be held in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 N.E.2d 732, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-pagac-ohio-2002.