Disciplinary Counsel v. Owen

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Owen

45 N.E.3d 1013, 144 Ohio St. 3d 1265

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 12, 2015

DocketNo. 2013-1981

StatusPublished

This text of 45 N.E.3d 1013 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Owen, 45 N.E.3d 1013, 144 Ohio St. 3d 1265 (Ohio 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, James David Owen, Attorney Registration No. 0003525, last known address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of October 22, 2014, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with the second year stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, James David Owen, Attorney Registration No. 0003525, last known address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of October 22, 2014, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with the second year stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 N.E.3d 1013, 144 Ohio St. 3d 1265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-owen-ohio-2015.