Disciplinary Counsel v. Oglesby

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Oglesby

79 Ohio St. 3d 1454

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 9, 1997

Docket91-2500

StatusPublished

This text of 79 Ohio St. 3d 1454 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Oglesby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Oglesby, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1454 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

On June 25, 1997, respondent Geoffrey Lynn Oglesby filed a response to relator’s response to this court’s May 13, 1997 order directing relator to file a response to respondent’s Application for Termination of Probation. There being no provision in the Supreme Court Rules of Practice or Rule V of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio permitting the filing of respondent’s response,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s response filed on June 25, 1997, be, and is hereby, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On June 25, 1997, respondent Geoffrey Lynn Oglesby filed a response to relator’s response to this court’s May 13, 1997 order directing relator to file a response to respondent’s Application for Termination of Probation. There being no provision in the Supreme Court Rules of Practice or Rule V of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio permitting the filing of respondent’s response,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s response filed on June 25, 1997, be, and is hereby, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 Ohio St. 3d 1454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-oglesby-ohio-1997.