Disciplinary Counsel v. Oberholtzer

2014 Ohio 651, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1422
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Oberholtzer. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 Ohio St. 3d 314
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 25, 2014·No. 2012-2073·Published

Opinion

On order to show cause. Mattheuw William Oberholtzer, Attorney Registration No. 0041239, is found in contempt for failure to comply with the court’s September 4, 2013 order. The previously imposed stay of his 12-month suspension is revoked, and he is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Oberholtzer, 2014 Ohio 651, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1422 (Ohio 2014).

2014 Ohio 651 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Oberholtzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.