Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount
This text of 794 N.E.2d 681 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On September 26, 2002, this court suspended respondent for a period of one year, stayed the suspension, and placed respondent on probation for a period of one year. This cause came on for consideration upon the filing, on August 18, 2003, of respondent’s application for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that respondent’s application be denied because respondent has not yet served the entire one-year period of probation imposed in the order of September 26, 2002.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
794 N.E.2d 681, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-mount-ohio-2003.