Disciplinary Counsel v. Mogul

853 N.E.2d 313, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1474
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 31, 2006·No. 2005-2341·Published

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by relator of a motion to appear and show cause. Respondent filed a response to relator’s motion and included a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and a motion to bring up the record. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by this court that respondent’s motion to dismiss and motion to bring up the record are denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mogul, 853 N.E.2d 313, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1474 (Ohio 2006).

853 N.E.2d 313 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Mogul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.