Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi

694 N.E.2d 73, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1409, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1393

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 18, 1998

Docket94-2654

StatusPublished

This text of 694 N.E.2d 73 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi, 694 N.E.2d 73, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1409, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1393 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause has come on for further consideration upon the filing of a Petition for Reinstatement by respondent, Philip Anthony Mesi. On April 22,1998, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and' Discipline filed its report recommending that respondent, Philip Anthony Mesi, be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(10)(G)(6), relator filed objections on May 7, 1998.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the court that respondent may file an answer brief on or before fifteen days from the date of filing of objections.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause has come on for further consideration upon the filing of a Petition for Reinstatement by respondent, Philip Anthony Mesi. On April 22,1998, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and' Discipline filed its report recommending that respondent, Philip Anthony Mesi, be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(10)(G)(6), relator filed objections on May 7, 1998.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the court that respondent may file an answer brief on or before fifteen days from the date of filing of objections.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

694 N.E.2d 73, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1409, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-mesi-ohio-1998.