Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley

2005 Ohio 7135, 841 N.E.2d 312, 108 Ohio St. 3d 1201
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 Ohio St. 3d 251
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 29, 2005·No. 2004-0082·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, William S. Medley, Attorney Registration No. 0031001, last known business address in Gallipolis, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 8, 2004, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of eighteen months, six months stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley, 104 Ohio St.3d 251, 2004-Ohio-6402, 819 N.E.2d 273.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley, 2005 Ohio 7135, 841 N.E.2d 312, 108 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 2005).

2005 Ohio 7135 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley
104 Ohio St. 3d 251 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)