Disciplinary Counsel v. McCully
This text of 102 Ohio St. 3d 1215 (Disciplinary Counsel v. McCully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Joanne McCully, Attorney Registration No. 0050039, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 18, 2002, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with one year stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 5} For earlier cases, see Disciplinary Counsel v. McCully, 97 Ohio St.3d 486, 2002-Ohio-6724, 780 N.E.2d 574; In re Report of the Comm. on Continuing Legal Edn. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 1458, 663 N.E.2d 647.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 Ohio St. 3d 1215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-mccully-ohio-2004.