Disciplinary Counsel v. McCormack

2 N.E.3d 286, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1494
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 2014
Docket2011-2055
StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.E.3d 286 (Disciplinary Counsel v. McCormack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Counsel v. McCormack, 2 N.E.3d 286, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1494 (Ohio 2014).

Opinion

On November 4, 2013, respondent, Thomas Arthur McCormack, filed an application for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order dated September 26, 2012, in which the court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, with the entire suspension stayed on conditions.

On consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that the probation of respondent, Thomas Arthur McCormack, Attorney Registration No. 0015570, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio, is terminated.

It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.E.3d 286, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-mccormack-ohio-2014.