Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer

741 N.E.2d 146, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1420, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 216
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Ohio St. 3d 185
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 2001·No. 96-985·Published

Opinion

This matter is pending before the court upon the filing by respondent of an application for termination of probation on June 14, 2000, and motion to consider termination of probation on December 6, 2000. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent’s motion be and hereby is granted to the extent that relator, Disciplinary Counsel, is ordered to show cause why he will not verify respondent’s compliance with the terms of probation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer, 741 N.E.2d 146, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1420, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 216 (Ohio 2001).

741 N.E.2d 146 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.