Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall

644 N.E.2d 655, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1450, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3536
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 25, 1995
Docket94-2368
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 644 N.E.2d 655 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall, 644 N.E.2d 655, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1450, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3536 (Ohio 1995).

Opinion

On motion for order to show cause. David Steele Marshall, Attorney Registration No. 0031544, is found in contempt, and he is immediately indefinitely suspended from the practice of law until he fully cooperates in the disciplinary investigation by complying with lawfully issued subpoenas duces tecum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall
1996 Ohio 241 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 N.E.2d 655, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1450, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-marshall-ohio-1995.