Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney

2018 Ohio 2726, 103 N.E.3d 825, 153 Ohio St. 3d 1218

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 13, 2018

Docket2016-1494

StatusPublished

This text of 2018 Ohio 2726 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney, 2018 Ohio 2726, 103 N.E.3d 825, 153 Ohio St. 3d 1218 (Ohio 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Thomas Patrick Maney Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0029042, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 6, 2017, in which the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney , 152 Ohio St.3d 201 , 2017-Ohio-8799 , 94 N.E.3d 533 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI