Disciplinary Counsel v. Mandel

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mandel

804 N.E.2d 487, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1473

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 2, 2004

Docket2000-1108

StatusPublished

This text of 804 N.E.2d 487 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Mandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mandel, 804 N.E.2d 487, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1473 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause has come on for further consideration upon the filing of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Stewart Mandel, Attorney Registration No. 0026161. On December 24, 2003, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed a final report recommending that respondent, Stewart Mandel, not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(10)(G)(5), respondent filed objections on February 26, 2004.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator may file an answer brief on or before 16 days from the date of filing of objections.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause has come on for further consideration upon the filing of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Stewart Mandel, Attorney Registration No. 0026161. On December 24, 2003, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed a final report recommending that respondent, Stewart Mandel, not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(10)(G)(5), respondent filed objections on February 26, 2004.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator may file an answer brief on or before 16 days from the date of filing of objections.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

804 N.E.2d 487, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-mandel-ohio-2004.