Disciplinary Counsel v. Jarabek

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Jarabek

919 N.E.2d 748, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1425

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 2010

Docket2008-1768

StatusPublished

This text of 919 N.E.2d 748 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Jarabek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Jarabek, 919 N.E.2d 748, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter came on for further consideration upon the filing of a motion for an order to appear and show cause filed by movant, Disciplinary Counsel, on November 24, 2009, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt for his failure to abide by the court’s February 25, 2009 order. Respondent did not file a response. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that respondent appear in person before this court on February 16, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter came on for further consideration upon the filing of a motion for an order to appear and show cause filed by movant, Disciplinary Counsel, on November 24, 2009, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt for his failure to abide by the court’s February 25, 2009 order. Respondent did not file a response. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that respondent appear in person before this court on February 16, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

919 N.E.2d 748, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-jarabek-ohio-2010.