Disciplinary Counsel v. Hutchins

820 N.E.2d 374, 104 Ohio St. 3d 1208
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Hutchins. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 Ohio St. 3d 97
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 2004·No. No. 2003-1196·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, A. Robert Hutchins, Attorney Registration No. 0015775, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

[1209] {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 28, 2004, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Hutchins, 102 Ohio St.3d 97, 2004-Ohio-1805, 807 N.E.2d 303.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hutchins, 820 N.E.2d 374, 104 Ohio St. 3d 1208 (Ohio 2004).

820 N.E.2d 374 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Hutchins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hutchins
807 N.E.2d 303 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)