Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton

2023 Ohio 1001, 223 N.E.3d 1281
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 29, 2023
Docket2018-1746
StatusPublished

This text of 2023 Ohio 1001 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton, 2023 Ohio 1001, 223 N.E.3d 1281 (Ohio 2023).

Opinion

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2023-Ohio-1001.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HORTON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2023-Ohio-1001.] (No. 2018-1746—Submitted March 21, 2023—Decided March 29, 2023.) ON PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on August 30, 2022, of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Timothy Solomon Horton, Attorney Registration No. 0065934. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(25)(E), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Professional Conduct. The board filed its final report in this court on February 3, 2023, recommending that respondent’s petition for reinstatement be granted subject to conditions. No objections to said final report were filed, and this cause was considered by the court. {¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that the petition for reinstatement of respondent is conditionally granted. Respondent, Timothy Solomon Horton, last known address in Lewis Center, Ohio, will be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio upon the following conditions: (1) he shall continue to participate in Alcoholics Anonymous meetings; (2) he shall continue counseling with Eric Currence, Ph.D. on an as-needed basis; (3) prior to reinstatement, he shall provide proof that he has taken and passed the Multi-State Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE); and (4) he shall provide proof to relator that he has completed three additional hours of continuing legal education on sexual harassment. {¶ 3} It is further ordered by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $2,136.62, less the deposit of $500, for a total balance due of $1,636.62 payable, by cashier’s check or money order, by SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

respondent on or before 90 days from the date of this order. If costs are not paid on or before 90 days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of ten percent per annum will accrue until costs are paid in full. It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before 90 days from the date of this order, the matter may be referred to the attorney general for collection and respondent may be found in contempt and suspended until all costs and accrued interest are paid in full. It is further ordered that respondent is liable for all collections costs pursuant to R.C. 131.02 if the debt is certified to the attorney general for collection. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton, 158 Ohio St.3d 76, 2019-Ohio-4139, 140 N.E.3d 561. KENNEDY, C.J., and DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, BRUNNER, and DETERS, JJ., concur. FISCHER, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, with an opinion. _________________ FISCHER, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. {¶ 6} I concur in part and dissent in part. I concur in the court’s decision to grant respondent Timothy Horton’s petition for reinstatement, but in order to protect the citizens of Ohio in futuro, I would grant the petition subject to the following conditions: (1) Horton shall continue to participate in Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, at least weekly if not more often than weekly; (2) he shall continue counseling with Eric Currence, Ph.D., on a regular basis; (3) prior to reinstatement, he shall provide proof that he has taken and passed the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE); and (4) he shall provide proof to relator, disciplinary counsel, that he has completed three additional hours of continuing legal education (“CLE”) on sexual harassment, and over the following

2 January Term, 2023

three years, he shall complete three hours of CLE on sexual harassment each year and report the same to relator. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 4139 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 Ohio 1001, 223 N.E.3d 1281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-horton-ohio-2023.