Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer

683 N.E.2d 1150, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1495, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 4001
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 1997·No. 96-1965·Published

Opinion

This matter is pending before the court upon the filing of an application of the city of Englewood and Eric A. Smith to intervene. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application be, and is, hereby, denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent and would allow twenty days to respond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer, 683 N.E.2d 1150, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1495, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 4001 (Ohio 1997).

683 N.E.2d 1150 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.