Disciplinary Counsel v. Halligan

2021 Ohio 183, 168 N.E.3d 1220, 163 Ohio St. 3d 1238
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 2021
Docket2018-1090
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 Ohio 183 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Halligan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Counsel v. Halligan, 2021 Ohio 183, 168 N.E.3d 1220, 163 Ohio St. 3d 1238 (Ohio 2021).

Opinion

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Halligan, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-183.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HALLIGAN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Halligan, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-183.] (No. 2018-1090—Submitted January 26, 2021—Decided January 27, 2021.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Brian Joseph Halligan, Attorney Registration No. 0024113, last known business address in Ashland, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 19, 2019, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with 18 months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21) and consistent with the opinion rendered herein on September 19, 2019, respondent shall serve an eighteen-month period of monitored probation. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this order relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(A)(3). It is further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, relator shall file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation. {¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(21). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated until SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

(1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated. {¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 7} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Halligan, 157 Ohio St.3d 447, 2019-Ohio-3748, 137 N.E.3d 1141. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. ________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Halligan (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 3748 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 Ohio 183, 168 N.E.3d 1220, 163 Ohio St. 3d 1238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-halligan-ohio-2021.