Disciplinary Counsel v. Haggins
822 N.E.2d 805, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1432
Opinion
On February 9, 2005, respondent filed a motion for extension of time to reply to an order to show cause. S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(3)(B)(1) prohibits the filing of a request for extension of time to file a response beyond the date set by the court’s order. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for extension be, and hereby is, stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Disciplinary Counsel v. Haggins, 822 N.E.2d 805, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1432 (Ohio 2005).
822 N.E.2d 805 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Haggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.