Disciplinary Counsel v. Haggins

822 N.E.2d 805, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1432
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 14, 2005
Docket2004-2034
StatusPublished

This text of 822 N.E.2d 805 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Haggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Counsel v. Haggins, 822 N.E.2d 805, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1432 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

On February 9, 2005, respondent filed a motion for extension of time to reply to an order to show cause. S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(3)(B)(1) prohibits the filing of a request for extension of time to file a response beyond the date set by the court’s order. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for extension be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
822 N.E.2d 805, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-haggins-ohio-2005.