Disciplinary Counsel v. Greco

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Greco

885 N.E.2d 248, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1482

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 25, 2008

Docket2005-0799

StatusPublished

This text of 885 N.E.2d 248 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Greco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Greco, 885 N.E.2d 248, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1482 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

On January 31, 2008, respondent, Anthony William Greco, Attorney Registration No. 0061582, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, filed an application for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order, dated July 3, 2006, wherein respondent was reinstated, the remaining eighteen months of his suspension were stayed, and respondent was placed on probation for a period of eighteen months.

Therefore, it is ordered by this court that the probation of respondent is terminated.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R.V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R.V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On January 31, 2008, respondent, Anthony William Greco, Attorney Registration No. 0061582, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, filed an application for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order, dated July 3, 2006, wherein respondent was reinstated, the remaining eighteen months of his suspension were stayed, and respondent was placed on probation for a period of eighteen months.

Therefore, it is ordered by this court that the probation of respondent is terminated.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R.V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R.V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

885 N.E.2d 248, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-greco-ohio-2008.