Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman
This text of 127 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On November 4, 2010, respondent, Benjamin Stuart Friedman, filed an application for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order, dated March 9, 2009, in which the court reinstated respondent to the practice of law and placed him on probation. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by this court that the probation of respondent, Benjamin Stuart Friedman, Attorney Registration No. 0074348, last known business address in Kingman, Arizona, is terminated.
It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 Ohio St. 3d 1451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-friedman-ohio-2010.