Disciplinary Counsel v. Frazier

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Frazier

848 N.E.2d 516, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1487

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 1, 2006

Docket2006-0124

StatusPublished

This text of 848 N.E.2d 516 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Frazier, 848 N.E.2d 516, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1487 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause is pending before the court on the report and recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. On May 9, 2006, respondent filed letters of recommendation with the court. Whereas the document does not consist of a list of citations to additional authorities as permitted by S.Ct.Prae.R. IX(7) and is not otherwise permitted under the Rules of Practice as a filing after completion of merit briefing,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the document is stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause is pending before the court on the report and recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. On May 9, 2006, respondent filed letters of recommendation with the court. Whereas the document does not consist of a list of citations to additional authorities as permitted by S.Ct.Prae.R. IX(7) and is not otherwise permitted under the Rules of Practice as a filing after completion of merit briefing,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the document is stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

848 N.E.2d 516, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-frazier-ohio-2006.