Disciplinary Counsel v. Engel

2012 Ohio 5994, 984 N.E.2d 1089, 134 Ohio St. 3d 1280
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Engel. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Ohio St. 3d 105
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 2012·No. 2011-1722·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Joshua Adam Engel, Attorney Registration No. 0075769, last known business address in Lebanon, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of May 17, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and Kennedy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Engel, 2012 Ohio 5994, 984 N.E.2d 1089, 134 Ohio St. 3d 1280 (Ohio 2012).

2012 Ohio 5994 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Engel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.