Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat

683 N.E.2d 1150, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1495, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2477
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 1997·No. 96-2781·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This matter is pending before the court upon the filing by respondent of a motion for reconsideration.

[1496]*1496Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and is, hereby, granted, and that respondent’s suspension is made coextensive with his new federal probationary period that ended July 22, 1997. It is further ordered by the court, sua sponte, that respondent may seek reinstatement to the practice of law by filing an application for reinstatement pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 189, 680 N.E.2d 972.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat, 683 N.E.2d 1150, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1495, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2477 (Ohio 1997).

683 N.E.2d 1150 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat
1998 Ohio 486 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)