Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell

1995 Ohio 159, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1215

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 12, 1995

Docket1993-1298

StatusPublished

This text of 1995 Ohio 159 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell, 1995 Ohio 159, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1215 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 71 Ohio St.3d 1215.]

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CAMPBELL. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell, 1995-Ohio-159.] (No. 93-1298—Submitted and decided January 13, 1995.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John H. Campbell. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 8, 1993, suspending respondent, John H. Campbell, Attorney Registration No. 0030184, last known business address in Akron, Ohio, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by the court that John H. Campbell be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 7, 623 N.E.2d 24. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 71 Ohio St.3d 1215.]

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CAMPBELL. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell, 1995-Ohio-159.] (No. 93-1298—Submitted and decided January 13, 1995.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John H. Campbell. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 8, 1993, suspending respondent, John H. Campbell, Attorney Registration No. 0030184, last known business address in Akron, Ohio, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by the court that John H. Campbell be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 7, 623 N.E.2d 24. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1995 Ohio 159, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-campbell-ohio-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack