Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine

2016 Ohio 2735, 52 N.E.3d 1194, 146 Ohio St. 3d 1229

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 29, 2016

Docket2012-2049 and 2014-1392

StatusPublished

This text of 2016 Ohio 2735 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine, 2016 Ohio 2735, 52 N.E.3d 1194, 146 Ohio St. 3d 1229 (Ohio 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} These causes came on for further consideration upon the filing of applications for reinstatement by respondent, Edward Royal Bunstine, Attorney Registration No. 0030127, last known business address in Chillicothe, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 28, 2013, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, and its order of September 16, 2015, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with those orders and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

*1230 {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} These causes came on for further consideration upon the filing of applications for reinstatement by respondent, Edward Royal Bunstine, Attorney Registration No. 0030127, last known business address in Chillicothe, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 28, 2013, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, and its order of September 16, 2015, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with those orders and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

*1230 {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 Ohio 2735, 52 N.E.3d 1194, 146 Ohio St. 3d 1229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-bunstine-ohio-2016.