Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
This text of 937 N.E.2d 1039 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a motion for an order to appear and show cause by relator. On November 15, 2010, respondent filed a motion for appointment of counsel and a request that any hearing in this matter be held in Cleveland, Ohio. Upon consideration thereof, It is ordered by this court that respondent’s motion and request are denied.
O’Donnell, J., dissents as to the denial of the motion to appoint counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
937 N.E.2d 1039, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-brown-ohio-2010.