Disciplinary Counsel v. Bonar

2014 Ohio 15, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1254
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 8, 2014
Docket2013-1944
StatusPublished

This text of 2014 Ohio 15 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Bonar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Counsel v. Bonar, 2014 Ohio 15, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1254 (Ohio 2014).

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in accordance with the reciprocal-discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F).

{¶ 2} On November 13, 2013, relator, disciplinary counsel, filed with this court a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of Kentucky entered August 29, 2013, in Kentucky Bar Assn. v. Bonar, in case No. 2013-SC-000335-KB, publicly reprimanding respondent. On November 14, 2013, this court ordered respondent to show cause why identical or comparable discipline should not be imposed in this state.

{¶ 3} On consideration thereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), respondent, Barbara D. Bonar, Attorney Registration No. 0043797, last known business address in Covington, Kentucky, is publicly reprimanded. This public reprimand shall be considered as a factor that may justify an increase in the degree of discipline to be imposed for subsequent misconduct.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that within 90 days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against respondent by the Clients’ Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if after the date of this order, the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of that award.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified *1255 mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Office of Attorney Services.

{¶ 7} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ohio 15, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-bonar-ohio-2014.