Disciplinary Counsel v. Blakeslee

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Blakeslee

2024 Ohio 2315, 241 N.E.3d 235, 175 Ohio St. 3d 1227

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 18, 2024

Docket2023-0741

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2024 Ohio 2315 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Blakeslee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Blakeslee, 2024 Ohio 2315, 241 N.E.3d 235, 175 Ohio St. 3d 1227 (Ohio 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 175 Ohio St.3d 1227.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BLAKESLEE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Blakeslee, 2024-Ohio-2315.] (No. 2023-0741—Submitted June 17, 2024—Decided June 18, 2024.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Jack Allen Blakeslee, Attorney Registration No. 0001005, last known business address in Caldwell, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 29, 2023, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Blakeslee, 2023-Ohio- 4202. KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, BRUNNER, and DETERS, JJ., concur. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 175 Ohio St.3d 1227.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BLAKESLEE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Blakeslee, 2024-Ohio-2315.] (No. 2023-0741—Submitted June 17, 2024—Decided June 18, 2024.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Jack Allen Blakeslee, Attorney Registration No. 0001005, last known business address in Caldwell, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 29, 2023, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Blakeslee, 2023-Ohio- 4202. KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, BRUNNER, and DETERS, JJ., concur. _________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2024 Ohio 2315, 241 N.E.3d 235, 175 Ohio St. 3d 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-blakeslee-ohio-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack