Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Korsmo

North Dakota Supreme Court

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Korsmo

2005 ND 148, 703 N.W.2d 305, 2005 N.D. LEXIS 183

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 3, 2005

DocketNo. 20050251

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 2005 ND 148 (Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Korsmo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Korsmo, 2005 ND 148, 703 N.W.2d 305, 2005 N.D. LEXIS 183 (N.D. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

INTERIM SUSPENSION ORDERED

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] On July 27, 2005, an Application for the Interim Suspension of John T. [306]*306Korsmo, a member of the Bar of North Dakota, and a certified copy of the Judgment in a Criminal Case in United, State of America John T. Korsmo, United States District Court, District of Columbia, Case No. CR05-104-01, was filed under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(D) by Paul W. Jacobson, Disciplinary Counsel. The Judgment in a Criminal Case shows that Korsmo was found guilty of one count of false and fictitious statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2), a felony.

[¶ 2] N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(D) provides that upon the filing with the court of a certificate or other satisfactory evidence of conviction demonstrating that a lawyer has been convicted of a serious crime, the court shall enter an order immediately suspending the lawyer pending final disposition of a disciplinary proceeding predicated upon the conviction.

[¶ 3] Under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(C), a serious crime is any felony and any lesser crime a necessary element of which, as determined by the statutory or common law definition of the crime, involves interference with the administration of justice, false swearing, misrepresentation, fraud, willful failure to file income tax returns, deceit, bribery, extortion, misappropriation, theft, or an attempt or a conspiracy or solicitation of another to commit any of those crimes.

[¶ 4] ORDERED, under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(D), John T. Korsmo’s certificate of admission to the Bar of the State of North Dakota is SUSPENDED effective immediately and until further order of this Court, pending final disposition of a disciplinary proceeding predicated upon the conviction.

[¶ 5] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., MARY MUEHLEN MARING and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur. [¶ 6] The Honorable DALE V. SANDSTROM and the Honorable DANIEL J. CROTHERS, deeming themselves disqualified, did not participate in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

INTERIM SUSPENSION ORDERED

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] On July 27, 2005, an Application for the Interim Suspension of John T. [306]*306Korsmo, a member of the Bar of North Dakota, and a certified copy of the Judgment in a Criminal Case in United, State of America John T. Korsmo, United States District Court, District of Columbia, Case No. CR05-104-01, was filed under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(D) by Paul W. Jacobson, Disciplinary Counsel. The Judgment in a Criminal Case shows that Korsmo was found guilty of one count of false and fictitious statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2), a felony.

[¶ 2] N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(D) provides that upon the filing with the court of a certificate or other satisfactory evidence of conviction demonstrating that a lawyer has been convicted of a serious crime, the court shall enter an order immediately suspending the lawyer pending final disposition of a disciplinary proceeding predicated upon the conviction.

[¶ 3] Under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(C), a serious crime is any felony and any lesser crime a necessary element of which, as determined by the statutory or common law definition of the crime, involves interference with the administration of justice, false swearing, misrepresentation, fraud, willful failure to file income tax returns, deceit, bribery, extortion, misappropriation, theft, or an attempt or a conspiracy or solicitation of another to commit any of those crimes.

[¶ 4] ORDERED, under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1(D), John T. Korsmo’s certificate of admission to the Bar of the State of North Dakota is SUSPENDED effective immediately and until further order of this Court, pending final disposition of a disciplinary proceeding predicated upon the conviction.

[¶ 5] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., MARY MUEHLEN MARING and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur. [¶ 6] The Honorable DALE V. SANDSTROM and the Honorable DANIEL J. CROTHERS, deeming themselves disqualified, did not participate in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2005 ND 148, 703 N.W.2d 305, 2005 N.D. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-board-of-the-supreme-court-v-korsmo-nd-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack