Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Ellis
This text of 465 N.W.2d 175 (Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By Order of the Supreme Court dated December 5, 1990, Cheryl L. Ellis was suspended from the practice of law for failure to respond to an order to show cause by November 27, 1990, why she had failed to contact Disciplinary Board Counsel Vivian Berg to arrange a new payment schedule and why her license to practice law in this state should not be suspended. This Order provided failure to respond would result in suspension from the practice of law. On December 21, 1990, letters dated October 31, 1990, and December 20, 1990, were received from Ms. Ellis. Pursuant to this Court’s request, Disciplinary Counsel Vivian E. Berg filed a response on January 29, 1991. The Court considered the matter, and
ORDERED, that the suspension of Cheryl L. Ellis continue in effect until reinstatement by the Supreme Court upon proper application for reinstatement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 N.W.2d 175, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 7, 1991 WL 15037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-board-of-the-supreme-court-of-the-state-of-north-dakota-v-nd-1991.