Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. Schleindl
This text of Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. Schleindl (Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. Schleindl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-17-0000333 01-MAY-2017 09:27 AM
SCAD-17-0000333
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE HAWAI#I SUPREME COURT, Petitioner,
vs.
LORENE SYLVIA CHU SCHLEINDL, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 16-0-258)
ORDER OF TRANSFER TO INVOLUNTARY INACTIVE STATUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon review of the April 7, 2017 petition filed by the
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i,
requesting this court to immediately transfer Respondent Lorene
Sylvia Chu Schleindl to involuntary inactive status, pursuant to
Rules 2.19(b) and (c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the
State of Hawai#i (RSCH), we conclude interim transfer to
involuntary inactive status is warranted. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Schleindl is
immediately transferred to involuntary inactive status in this
jurisdiction, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.19(c), effective with the filing of this order. Respondent Schleindl shall remain on
involuntary inactive status until further order of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon transfer of Respondent
Schleindl to inactive status, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel
shall suspend and hold in abeyance the investigation of
complaints and the disciplinary proceedings to the extent
required by RSCH Rule 2.19(h).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, while the docket in this
matter remains confidential, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.22(f), the
clerk of the court shall classify this instant order as public.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Disciplinary Board shall
publicize and transmit this order as required by RSCH Rules
2.19(d) and 2.19(e).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 1, 2017.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. Schleindl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-board-of-the-hawaii-supreme-court-v-schleindl-haw-2017.