Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Herran
This text of Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Herran (Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Herran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 13-JUL-2021 01:52 PM Dkt. 9 ORD
SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE HAWAIʻI SUPREME COURT, Petitioner,
vs.
PAUL HERRAN (Bar No. 8207), Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (DB NO. 21-9002)
ORDER OF TRANSFER TO INACTIVE STATUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon review of the June 30, 2021 petition filed by the
Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) on behalf of, and with the
approval of, the Disciplinary Board of the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court,
requesting this court to immediately transfer Respondent Paul
Herran to inactive status, pursuant to Rules 2.19 (b) and 2.19(c)
of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi (RSCH), we
conclude transfer to inactive status is warranted. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Paul Herran is
immediately transferred to inactive status in this jurisdiction,
pursuant to RSCH Rules 2.19(b) and 2.19(c), effective with the filing of this order. Respondent Herran shall remain on inactive
status until further order of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ODC shall suspend and hold in
abeyance proceedings against Respondent Herran to the extent
required by RSCH Rule 2.19(h).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Disciplinary Board shall,
pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.19(d) (2021), cause a notice of this
transfer to inactive status to be published.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the clerk of the court,
pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.19(e), shall transmit a certified copy of
this order to all judges of the State of Hawaiʻi and shall request
their assistance and such action as may be indicated, pursuant to
RSCH Rule 2.20, to protect the interests of both Respondent Herran
and his clients, if any.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 13, 2021.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Herran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-board-of-the-hawaii-supreme-court-v-herran-haw-2021.