Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Garbarino
This text of Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Garbarino (Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Garbarino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 06-SEP-2022 10:23 AM Dkt. 3 ORD
SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE HAWAI#I SUPREME COURT, Petitioner,
vs.
MICHAEL HENRY GARBARINO, (Bar No. 10474), Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC Nos. 19-0392, 19-0411, 19-0534, 20-0166, 20-0197)
ORDER OF TRANSFER TO INACTIVE STATUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon review of the August 31, 2022 petition filed by
the Office of Disciplinary Counsel on behalf of, and with the
approval of, the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai#i Supreme Court,
requesting this court to transfer Respondent Michael Henry
Garbarino to inactive status, pursuant to Rules 2.19 (b) and
2.19(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i
(RSCH), we conclude transfer to inactive status is warranted.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Garbarino is
transferred to inactive status in this jurisdiction, pursuant to RSCH Rules 2.19(b) and 2.19(c), effective with the filing of this
order. Respondent Garbarino shall remain on inactive status
until further order of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ODC shall suspend and hold
in abeyance proceedings against Respondent Garbarino to the
extent required by RSCH Rule 2.19(h).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Disciplinary Board
shall, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.19(d), cause a notice of this
transfer to inactive status to be published.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the clerk of the court,
pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.19(e), shall transmit a certified copy of
this order to all judges of the State of Hawai#i and shall
request their assistance and such action as may be indicated to
protect the interests of both Respondent Garbarino and his
clients, if any.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 6, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Garbarino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-board-of-the-hawaii-supreme-court-v-garbarino-haw-2022.