Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Edelman
This text of Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Edelman (Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Edelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 02-MAY-2022 10:53 AM Dkt. 3 ORD
SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE HAWAI#I SUPREME COURT, Petitioner,
vs.
JOEL IRA EDELMAN, (Bar No. 6582), Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC NO. 19-0456)
ORDER OF TRANSFER TO INACTIVE STATUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon review of the April 28, 2022 petition filed by the
Office of Disciplinary Counsel on behalf of, and with the
approval of, the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai#i Supreme Court,
requesting this court to transfer Respondent Joel Ira Edelman to
inactive status, pursuant to Rules 2.19 (b) and 2.19(c) of the
Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), we
conclude transfer to inactive status is warranted. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Edelman is
transferred to inactive status in this jurisdiction, pursuant to
RSCH Rules 2.19(b) and 2.19(c), effective with the filing of this order. Respondent Edelman shall remain on inactive status until
further order of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ODC shall suspend and hold
in abeyance proceedings against Respondent Edelman to the extent
required by RSCH Rule 2.19(h).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Disciplinary Board
shall, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.19(d), cause a notice of this
transfer to inactive status to be published.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the clerk of the court,
pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.19(e), shall transmit a certified copy of
this order to all judges of the State of Hawai#i and shall
request their assistance and such action as may be indicated to
protect the interests of both Respondent Edelman and his clients,
if any.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 2, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Edelman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-board-of-the-hawaii-supreme-court-v-edelman-haw-2022.