Disbrow v. State

79 So. 3d 881, 2012 WL 407160, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1935
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 2012·No. 5D11-3999·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Dis-brow’s motion seeking postconviction relief. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Disbrow challenging his sentence on double jeopardy grounds. See, e.g., Obantu v. State, 50 So.3d 107 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (probationer, whose original sentences were true split sentences, could not be sentenced in two violation of probation cases to term exceeding remaining balance of suspended portion of his sentences).

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disbrow v. State, 79 So. 3d 881, 2012 WL 407160, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1935 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

79 So. 3d 881 (Disbrow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Obantu v. State
50 So. 3d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)