Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Disbrow v. State

Disbrow v. State

79 So. 3d 881, 2012 WL 407160, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1935
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 10, 2012
Docket5D11-3999
StatusPublished

This text of 79 So. 3d 881 (Disbrow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disbrow v. State, 79 So. 3d 881, 2012 WL 407160, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1935 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Dis-brow’s motion seeking postconviction relief. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Disbrow challenging his sentence on double jeopardy grounds. See, e.g., Obantu v. State, 50 So.3d 107 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (probationer, whose original sentences were true split sentences, could not be sentenced in two violation of probation cases to term exceeding remaining balance of suspended portion of his sentences).

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Obantu v. State
50 So. 3d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 So. 3d 881, 2012 WL 407160, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disbrow-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.