Disbrow v. . Disbrow

New York Court of Appeals

Disbrow v. . Disbrow

58 N.E. 1086, 164 N.Y. 564, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 935

DecidedOctober 2, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.E. 1086 (Disbrow v. . Disbrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disbrow v. . Disbrow, 58 N.E. 1086, 164 N.Y. 564, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 935 (N.Y. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We do not concur in the strictures passed upon counsel in the opinion at the Appellate Division, but as we cannot say that there was no evidence to support the findings to the effect that the execution and delivery of the deed were not the voluntary acts of the plaintiff, but was brought about by undue influence exercised on the part of the defendant, who stood in a confidential relation towards her, we are constrained to affirm the judgment.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Vann, Landon, Cullen, and Werner, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We do not concur in the strictures passed upon counsel in the opinion at the Appellate Division, but as we cannot say that there was no evidence to support the findings to the effect that the execution and delivery of the deed were not the voluntary acts of the plaintiff, but was brought about by undue influence exercised on the part of the defendant, who stood in a confidential relation towards her, we are constrained to affirm the judgment.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Vann, Landon, Cullen, and Werner, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.E. 1086, 164 N.Y. 564, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disbrow-v-disbrow-ny-1900.