Disanto v. State
817 So. 2d 946, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6878, 2002 WL 1021592
This text of 817 So. 2d 946 (Disanto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Disanto v. State, 817 So. 2d 946, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6878, 2002 WL 1021592 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the Commission’s findings of fact, we affirm. Botner v. State, Dep’t of Admin. Div. of Ret., 438 So.2d 94, 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Division of Ret. v. Allen, 395 So.2d 1192, 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Kennedy v. Wiggins, 368 So.2d 454, 455-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Division of Retirement v. Allen
395 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Kennedy v. Wiggins
368 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Botner v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement
438 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
817 So. 2d 946, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6878, 2002 WL 1021592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disanto-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.