Disalvo Properties, LLC v. Purvis

516 S.W.3d 427, 2017 WL 1404359, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 309
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 18, 2017·No. No. ED 105062·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DiSalvo Properties, LLC appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment entered in favor of Gary L. Hall; Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC; and Pen-fields Business Centers, LLC (Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude Respondents are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on material facts to which there is no genuine dispute. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disalvo Properties, LLC v. Purvis, 516 S.W.3d 427, 2017 WL 1404359, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 309 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

516 S.W.3d 427 (Disalvo Properties, LLC v. Purvis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.
854 S.W.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1993)