Directv, Inc., etc. v. State of Florida, Dept. of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 2017·No. 14-0292·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

DIRECTV, INC., N/K/A DIRECTV, LLC, AND ECHOSTAR SATELLITE, L.L.C., N/K/A DISH NETWORK, L.L.C.,

Appellants,

v. CASE NOS. 1D13-5444 & 1D14-0292

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MARCUS AND PATRICIA OGBORN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, JIM ZINGALE, ACTING IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE DIRECTOR OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, AND FLORIDA CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION,

Appellees.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

Katherine E. Giddings and Kristen M. Fiore of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; Peter O. Larsen, Timothy J. McDermott, and Aleksas A. Barauskas of Akerman LLP, Jacksonville; E. Joshua Rosenkranz and Jeremy N. Kudon of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLC, New York, N.Y., pro hac vice; and Eric A. Shumsky of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLC, Washington, D.C., pro hac vice, for Appellants.

Christine Davis Graves of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Tallahassee; John A. Hinman of Hinman & Carmichael, San Francisco, CA, pro hac vice, for Amicus Curiae National Association of Wine Retailers.

Joseph C. Mellichamp, III, and J. Clifton Cox, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee State of Florida.

Amelia T. Rudolph, Eric S. Tresh, and Zachary T. Atkins of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Atlanta, GA, pro hac vice; David Konuch, Tallahassee, for Appellee Florida Cable Telecommunications Association.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

We originally reversed the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in

favor of the appellee, finding that the sales tax portion of the Communications

Services Tax Simplification Law violated the Commerce Clause in Directv, Inc. v.

Florida Department of Revenue, 218 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (Directv I).

Thereafter, the Florida Supreme Court reversed our opinion and found that section

202.12(1), Florida Statutes, did not violate the Commerce Clause in Florida

Department of Revenue v. Directv, Inc., 215 So. 3d 43 (Fla. 2017) (Directv II).

2 Applying Directv II, we find that the trial court did not err in granting

summary judgment in favor of appellees and ordering the appellants to pay costs.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Directv, Inc., etc. v. State of Florida, Dept. of Revenue, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Directv, Inc., etc. v. State of Florida, Dept. of Revenue (Directv, Inc., etc. v. State of Florida, Dept. of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dale Lee Norman v. State of Florida
215 So. 3d 18 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)